|
CCO
launches Water Strategy Initiative
|
There is no quick fix for
Ontario's water woes.
As our latest factsheet on
a Clean Water Strategy for Ontario shows, Ontario needs to
address all of the major threats to the quantity and quality of
water in Ontario. These threats include:
- overdevelopment
- pollution from industry,
agriculture, municipal sewage, landfills, and mining
operations
- inadequate infrastructure
- inadequate reporting
requirements
Thus far, the Ministry of
the Environment has taken steps to address the reporting
requirements by posting a notice on the
Environmental Registry to the effect that a new regulation with respect to
testing of drinking water is under development.
SAFE
DRINKING WATER ACT
The Toronto Environment Alliance and the Canadian
Environmental Law Association held a press conference calling for
a Safe Drinking Water Act. NDP Environment Critic Marilyn
Churley has taken it a step further by introducing a Safe
Drinking Water Act as a private members bill.
While not addressing some of
the root problems of overdevelopment and pollution, a Safe
Drinking Water Act would enshrine many key requirements in
legislation by:
- converting the current
guidelines into enforceable standards
- requiring adequate funding for
water infrastructure
- requiring regular testing and
reporting of the results
The Conservation Council
hopes to co-sponsor a public workshop in the Fall on a Clean Water
Strategy for Ontario.
|
Anderson
Responds to CCO's Call for a Full Review of Food Biotechnology
|
Federal Environment
Minister David Anderson has responded to the Conservation
Council's call for a comprehensive review of the food
biotechnology industry, covering the social, health, ethical,
economic, and environmental aspects.
Stating that he will
continue to work with colleagues in Health Canada and Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada to address the immediate and long-term
implications of a "biobased" economy, the Minister
referred our comments to the Royal Society of Canada (RSC) Expert
Panel, and to the Canadian
Biotechnology Advisory Committee.
The CBAC's mandate
does include ethical considerations, and its workplan does include
a project on GM foods: Project
P1: The Regulation of Genetically-Modified Foods. In its
workplan, CBAC draws the link to the Expert Panel:
"Given the proposed establishment of an Expert Scientific Panel focussed on the science base, CBAC will concentrate on the governance and organization of regulatory regimes and on the social, ethical, legal, economic and environmental aspects of food
biotechnology".
Work begins immediately by
the CBAC on
two research topics:
1) Examination of the governance and regulation of the food regulatory system.
2) Examination of the social, ethical, legal, economic and environmental aspects of GM food
Following the release of the
Expert Panel report in the Fall, CBAC will produce an overarching
report to look at, among other things, the social, ethical, legal, economic and environmental
issues, policy options, and the need for public debate.
It appears this is the best
route for a comprehensive review of food biotechnology, although
many of the CCO's concerns about the Expert Panel process can be
applied to CBAC -- for example, the lack of a balance in the
membership and biases of the pre-selected committee members, and
the emphasis on "knowledge-based deliberation".
Environmental education may
have been dropped as a provincial priority, but it is certainly
present at the federal level.
Environment Canada has set
up an on-line consultation process on how it can develop a
national strategy on environmental education and sustainability.
For information, and to
register go to http://www.ec.gc.ca/education/
eeintro_e.htm
|
Human Activity
and the Environment 2000 |
Statistics Canada has just
released Human Activity and the Environment 2000. For $75
you get the book and a CD ROM with the latest environmental stats
and regional breakdown.
For information see
http://www.statcan.ca:80/english
/IPS/Data/11-509-XPE.htm
|
The air is clearer at the
top.
All three levels of
government were present at the June 21 Toronto Smog Summit, and
all three came with new commitments to reducing smog.
Transportation Minister
David Collenette announced that Via Rail will develop a commuter
strategy for the GTA and other regions. Environment Minister
David Anderson announced that particulate matter under 10 microns
(PM10) would be declared toxic under the Canadian Environmental
Protection Act, with sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile
organic compounds, and ammonia to follow in the near future.
For his part, Environment
Minister Dan Newman promised:
- speeding up the Anti Smog Action
Plan target to 2010 from 2015
- a regulation to require
industries to report air emissions
- setting up an Anti-Smog Action
Plan Executive Committee
Does it add up to clean air?
Well not quite, but it is a start. As our Smog
factsheet shows, we have to address energy consumption, urban
sprawl, and public transit before we can hope to make significant
inroads.
|
Minister
of Environment speaks to the Government Record on
Enforcement |
The Estimates process is one
of the little-known accountability measures within
government. This is when a parliamentary committee gets to
grill ministers about the spending priorities of the government.
This year, the Minister of the
Environment, Dan Newman, was on the hot seat. The full
text of his speech is on the Ministry website. It includes a
summary of ministry accomplishments in air quality, water quality,
and waste management.
If you've been following
Question Period in the legislature , you'll know there's an ongoing debate over the cuts to the Ministry of
the Environment and whether there were actually any cuts to the ministry's enforcement
officers.
On June 13, NDP Leader quoted
internal government documents that showed that "in 1995 there were 890 people in the enforcement and inspection branch, and by 1998 there were only 651."
See
Hansard for June 13, 2000.
No direct answer was given at the
time, but at the Estimates Committee Hearing, Minister Newman had
this to say:
"To summarize, in 1990-91, the ministry had 3,317 funded positions; now
it has 1,501. Since 1990-91:
- 980 positions transferred to OCWA
- 117 positions transferred to EST
- 56 positions transferred to the Shared Services Bureau
- 21 positions at the Niagara Escarpment Commission transferred to MNR
- 802 positions reduced principally in managerial, administrative and technical areas
- offset to some extent by a number of additions for priority programs, including, for example, a Drive Clean complement of 37 in 1998-99."
"Contrary to any
allegations of reductions in inspection and investigative
functions , the reality was that compliance funding has only been
reduced by 10 per cent but makes up 49 per cent of the ministry’s
workforce compared to 40 per cent in 94-95 and no reductions were
made to the investigative staff."
Clear?
|
OPPI
supports Protection of
Oak
Ridges Moraine |
The Ontario Professional Planners
Institute (OPPI) has released a position paper on the Oak Ridges Moraine.
The OPPI believes that strong and immediate action is needed from the Ontario Government to protect this significant natural
resource:
"Managed correctly, under clear policies, the Moraine represents an important opportunity to set a positive precedent for land use planning in environmentally sensitive areas."
OPPI suggest that a provincial policy should clearly define:
- areas to be protected;
- areas suitable for controlled, environmentally sensitive development or resource use; and
- areas that can support managed growth.
Details are on the What's
New section of the OPPI site.
The
latest series of Ministry Business Plans has just been
released. The plans are posted on the
Management Board site in PDF format.
Several
Ministries have responded to the CCO's Missing
Values report by incorporating a reference to their
Statement of Environment Values in the Business Plan.
The CCO is currently
preparing a detailed review of the new plans. Details
next month!
|